[Adminsysters] Mastodon - what do we want and how do we want it

[Gaba]

On 11/22/22 04:37, mara wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Sorry to bring the mood a bit down, but I'm seeing many new 
> registrations on our mastodon, while we haven't yet a policy meeting.
> Can we slow down a bit?

I think approval has been happening the same way as before.  We need a 
policy for sure.

> Also wld like to discuss a member contribution mechanism for our 
> instance.

Sure! I was proposing opencollective as it has a transparent way of 
showing expenses.


>
> Just adding a date here to decide a policy meeting won't work for 
> moderators and sysadmins to find a good date/time. Can someone please 
> make a date poll?
> Just to let you know, that I am UTC+2, and I cannot be in a late 
> evening meeting such as 19.00 UTC, can we aim for latest starting at 
> 18:00 UTC instead? 


1800 utc is 7am here. I do not think I can make it in the weekends.


> Thank you.
> Mara
>
> On 11/20/22 04:01, Gaba wrote:
>> On 11/20/22 01:14, Anne Roth wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 14.11.22 um 05:29 schrieb Gaba:
>>>
>>>>> Like, how do we move on now? Threre is the new pad with quite a 
>>>>> few comments and suggestions for change and the old pad with a lot 
>>>>> of good ideas and suggestions. Does it make sense to try and merge 
>>>>> or would it be better to stick with one and try to some up with a 
>>>>> draft?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think we should meet and draft something. Otherwise one of us can 
>>>> draft and we work from there.  I think we should merge both pads 
>>>> for this draft.
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late reply, had too many other things. So yes, let's 
>>> meet - when?
>>> Who's want to participate and what's a good time generally for you 
>>> and the timezone you live in?
>>>
>>> Me: Central Europe, UTC+1, preferably on the weekends or late 
>>> afternoon till maybe 10pm here.
>>
>>
>> For me is better on Friday, Saturday or Sunday. Any time between 
>> 19utc and 8utc would work.  I'm in UTC+13
>>
>>
>> What about next Saturday November 26th at 19utc?
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying you would like to see systerserver.town to be more 
>>>>> of a closed small(er) community?
>>>>
>>>> I think we should not open up registration. We should setup the 
>>>> rules, policies, etc and then continue having systerserver.town by 
>>>> invitation. We can give invites in any of the events people 
>>>> organize or our own networks . We could ask people to join.
>>>
>>> I totally agree. I'd like it to be open for a wider feminist 
>>> community and at the same time not open to all. Because I like the 
>>> idea of this being a space of a defined community and also because 
>>> my feeling is that we're all doing this next to many other things 
>>> and we might not have the capacity to deal with something very big (?).
>>>
>>> I'd already like to suggest a specific chat group or list or 
>>> something to help with decisions about accounts that need to be 
>>> approved. I'm doing it 'on the fly' basically deciding on how an 
>>> account name 'feels' - sometimes I know them, often it's very 
>>> obvious they're spam, but with Mastodon growing we have more account 
>>> registrations and it get's less obvious who they are. It would be 
>>> great to have a place to quickly ask whether anyone else knows the 
>>> people behind the account names. What do you think?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Anne
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Adminsysters mailing list
>>> Adminsysters at lists.genderchangers.org
>>> https://lists.genderchangers.org/mailman/listinfo/adminsysters
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Adminsysters mailing list
>> Adminsysters at lists.genderchangers.org
>> https://lists.genderchangers.org/mailman/listinfo/adminsysters
>